<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vim</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lynxworks.eu/20091121/vim/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lynxworks.eu/20091121/vim</link>
	<description>I don't think there are any dragons here...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:23:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Wright</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynxworks.eu/20091121/vim/comment-page-1#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynxworks.eu/?p=1038#comment-778</guid>
		<description>Just reinstalling Ubuntu at the moment and vim-tiny certainly is there (thank goodness). Makes sense that KUbuntu of all derivatives would be missing it in any case as (in my experience) KDE users just tend to use Kate anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just reinstalling Ubuntu at the moment and vim-tiny certainly is there (thank goodness). Makes sense that KUbuntu of all derivatives would be missing it in any case as (in my experience) KDE users just tend to use Kate anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Wright</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynxworks.eu/20091121/vim/comment-page-1#comment-776</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynxworks.eu/?p=1038#comment-776</guid>
		<description>Actually the command vim does not do anything by default, the vi command acts like the old Vi editor though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the command vim does not do anything by default, the vi command acts like the old Vi editor though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Wright</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynxworks.eu/20091121/vim/comment-page-1#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynxworks.eu/?p=1038#comment-775</guid>
		<description>Yes, I suppose now we have the best of both worlds; we have awesome editors but don&#039;t need them just to get the computer to boot up.

The one thing I worry about now though is whether I might be stranded on shared systems without Vim, a fate not worth thinking about (just having vim-tiny does not bother me too much).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I suppose now we have the best of both worlds; we have awesome editors but don&#8217;t need them just to get the computer to boot up.</p>
<p>The one thing I worry about now though is whether I might be stranded on shared systems without Vim, a fate not worth thinking about (just having vim-tiny does not bother me too much).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dominik</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynxworks.eu/20091121/vim/comment-page-1#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>dominik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynxworks.eu/?p=1038#comment-772</guid>
		<description>&gt;I’m a bit disappointed to hear that vim-tiny is not
&gt;installed by default in Ubuntu.

Uhm, you meant vim(full), right? On my fresh install there was
vim-tiny installed (ubuntu and debian)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;I’m a bit disappointed to hear that vim-tiny is not<br />
&gt;installed by default in Ubuntu.</p>
<p>Uhm, you meant vim(full), right? On my fresh install there was<br />
vim-tiny installed (ubuntu and debian)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dougie</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynxworks.eu/20091121/vim/comment-page-1#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>Dougie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynxworks.eu/?p=1038#comment-771</guid>
		<description>I mentioned compatible mode in the second paragraph!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mentioned compatible mode in the second paragraph!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dougie</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynxworks.eu/20091121/vim/comment-page-1#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>Dougie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynxworks.eu/?p=1038#comment-770</guid>
		<description>I thought that was a little odd too, I think we generally tend to view the different flavours as only differing by interface but it seems not to be the case.

Although I&#039;ve used XFCE a lot, Xubuntu is fairly new to me having used Gnome until recently but I have noticed a lot of little differences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that was a little odd too, I think we generally tend to view the different flavours as only differing by interface but it seems not to be the case.</p>
<p>Although I&#8217;ve used XFCE a lot, Xubuntu is fairly new to me having used Gnome until recently but I have noticed a lot of little differences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mackenzie</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynxworks.eu/20091121/vim/comment-page-1#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Mackenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynxworks.eu/?p=1038#comment-769</guid>
		<description>Ooooh I didn&#039;t think that&#039;d be something that&#039;d vary by Xubuntu, Kubuntu, Ubuntu. I&#039;m actually a Kubuntu user.  I just assumed all 3 would include the same command line tools but just different graphical ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooooh I didn&#8217;t think that&#8217;d be something that&#8217;d vary by Xubuntu, Kubuntu, Ubuntu. I&#8217;m actually a Kubuntu user.  I just assumed all 3 would include the same command line tools but just different graphical ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dominiko</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynxworks.eu/20091121/vim/comment-page-1#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>dominiko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynxworks.eu/?p=1038#comment-768</guid>
		<description>&gt; I remembered that pressing the cursor keys in
&gt; insert mode inserts characters.

This is because by default, Vim runs in compatible mode
which means that &#039;esckeys&#039; is off, among other things.

Cursor keys can be made to work in insert mode by doing
&quot;:set esckeys&quot;. You can also make them work with
&quot;:set nocompatible&quot; since this involves switching on
&#039;esckeys&#039;.

You can read about it in &quot;:help &#039;esckeys&#039;&quot;.

I&#039;m a bit disappointed to hear that vim-tiny is not
installed by default in Ubuntu.  It&#039;s a small package
and Linux is not Linux without Vi.

Anyway, any serious Vim user will install vim-full
or compile the latest Vim from sources since vim packages
are always lagging behind many patches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; I remembered that pressing the cursor keys in<br />
&gt; insert mode inserts characters.</p>
<p>This is because by default, Vim runs in compatible mode<br />
which means that &#8216;esckeys&#8217; is off, among other things.</p>
<p>Cursor keys can be made to work in insert mode by doing<br />
&#8220;:set esckeys&#8221;. You can also make them work with<br />
&#8220;:set nocompatible&#8221; since this involves switching on<br />
&#8216;esckeys&#8217;.</p>
<p>You can read about it in &#8220;:help &#8216;esckeys&#8217;&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a bit disappointed to hear that vim-tiny is not<br />
installed by default in Ubuntu.  It&#8217;s a small package<br />
and Linux is not Linux without Vi.</p>
<p>Anyway, any serious Vim user will install vim-full<br />
or compile the latest Vim from sources since vim packages<br />
are always lagging behind many patches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dougie</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynxworks.eu/20091121/vim/comment-page-1#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>Dougie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynxworks.eu/?p=1038#comment-767</guid>
		<description>Not disputing that they aren&#039;t in Ubuntu, I installed Xubuntu though - where vim-tiny still has a home - it&#039;s listed in Synaptic and this system has a default install.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not disputing that they aren&#8217;t in Ubuntu, I installed Xubuntu though &#8211; where vim-tiny still has a home &#8211; it&#8217;s listed in Synaptic and this system has a default install.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mackenzie</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynxworks.eu/20091121/vim/comment-page-1#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>Mackenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynxworks.eu/?p=1038#comment-766</guid>
		<description>My .vimrc includes &quot;set nocompatible&quot; but with vim-tiny it still acts like vi, not vim, so I&#039;m pretty sure vim-tiny just plain doesn&#039;t support using arrow keys.

And again: vi, vim, vim-tiny...NONE of these are included in 9.10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My .vimrc includes &#8220;set nocompatible&#8221; but with vim-tiny it still acts like vi, not vim, so I&#8217;m pretty sure vim-tiny just plain doesn&#8217;t support using arrow keys.</p>
<p>And again: vi, vim, vim-tiny&#8230;NONE of these are included in 9.10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
