<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lynxworks &#187; Psychology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lynxworks.eu/tag/psychology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lynxworks.eu</link>
	<description>I don&#039;t think there are any dragons here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:42:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Stanford-Binet IQ Test</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynxworks.eu/2008/06/stanford-binet-iq-test/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lynxworks.eu/2008/06/stanford-binet-iq-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dougie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynxworks.eu/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you know that the Stanford-Binet IQ test, when first translated to English in 1908 by Henry H Goddard, the scale used very different definitions to those used today? Currently in its fith revision, the system uses ten groupings but &#8230; <a href="http://blog.lynxworks.eu/2008/06/stanford-binet-iq-test/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know that the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford-Binet_IQ_test#Present_use">Stanford-Binet IQ test</a>, when first translated to English in 1908 by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_H._Goddard">Henry H Goddard</a>, the scale used very different definitions to those used today?</p>
<p>Currently in its fith revision, the system uses ten groupings but the 1908 translation&#8217;s <a href="http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/IQBasics.aspx">first three classifications</a> were: 0 to 20 &#8211; <strong>Idiot</strong>; 20 to 49 &#8211; <strong>Imbecile</strong>; 50 to 69 &#8211; <strong>Moron</strong> (the average IQ being around 100).</p>
<p>Also, believe it or not mental retardation and learning difficulties were referred to as the spectacularly offensive &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feeble-minded">Feeble Minded</a>&#8220;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lynxworks.eu/2008/06/stanford-binet-iq-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

